Issue 0032 in split format
- Summary
- remove open_posix test suite
; Owner: Tim
; Reporter: Daniel
; Status: open
; Priority: medium
|
; Summary: remove open_posix test suite
; Owner: Tim
; Reporter: Daniel
; Status: open
; Priority: medium
|
|
message.
{{{#!YellowBox
I was trying FUEGO's "Functional.posixtestsuite" and noticed a few bugs
such as "./execute.sh: line 2017: [: -eq: unary operator expected".
|
= Description =
reported on the fuego mailing list in this [[https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/fuego/2016-October/000063.html|message]].
{{{#!YellowBox
I was trying FUEGO's "Functional.posixtestsuite" and noticed a few bugs
such as "./execute.sh: line 2017: [: -eq: unary operator expected".
|
|
Then, I realized that this code is deprecated, and it is currently maintained inside
the LTP testsuite. In particular, FUEGO's Functional.LTP.Open_Posix.
|
Then, I realized that this code is deprecated, and it is currently maintained inside
the LTP testsuite. In particular, FUEGO's Functional.LTP.Open_Posix.
|
|
Is there any reason to keep Functional.posixtestsuite if we already have the
latest version of the Open Posix testuiste inside LTP?
}}}
|
Is there any reason to keep Functional.posixtestsuite if we already have the
latest version of the Open Posix testuiste inside LTP?
}}}
|
|
|
= Notes =
Tim's answer: I don't think so. This should be removed.
|
- backlink
Fuego Issues List
|
; backlink: [[Fuego Issues List]]
|